* feat(chromium): roll Chromium to r768783
* fix: update unit test for crrev:2135046
* chore: update devtools-protocol revision
Co-authored-by: Changhao Han <changhaohan@chromium.org>
Now the async hooks helper is gone api.ts was only used by the coverage
tools and by doclint.
DocLint is nearing the end of its lifespan with the TSDoc work, so I
focused on how best to define a list of modules for the coverage
tooling. They define an object of classes, and the path to that module.
They need the full path because we also check if the module exports any
events that need to be emitted - the coverage tool asserts that the
emitting of those events is also tested.
It's not _great_ that DocLint relies on a constant defined in the
coverage utils, but it should only be this way for a short period of
time and no one is actively working on DocLint (bar the effort to remove
it) so I don't think this is worth worrying about.
This change also broke the DocLint tests; based on the fact that DocLint is on its way out it doesn't feel worth fixing the tests, so this commit also removes them.
* chore: remove `installAsyncStackHooks` helper
This code was written when browsers/Node didn't support errors in async
functions very well. They now do a much better job of this, so we can
lose the additonal complexity from our codebase and leave it to the host
environment :)
* lazy launcher is private
* remove async stack test
This pulls in the types (based on the DefinitelyTyped repo) for
`page.$eval` (and the `$eval` method on other classes). The `$eval`
method is quite hard to type due to the way we wrap and unwrap
ElementHandles that are passed to / returned from the `pageFunction`
that users provide.
Longer term we can improve the types by providing type overloads as
DefinitelyTyped does but I've deferred that for now (see the `TODO` in
the code for more details).
This change started as a small change to pull types from DefinitelyTyped over to
Puppeteer for the `evaluateHandle` function but instead ended up also fixing
what looks to be a long standing issue with our existing documentation.
`evaluateHandle` can in fact return an `ElementHandle` rather than a `JSHandle`.
Note that `ElementHandle` extends `JSHandle` so whilst the docs are technically
correct (all ElementHandles are JSHandles) it's confusing because JSHandles
don't have methods like `click` on them, but ElementHandles do.
if you return something that is an HTML element:
```
const button = page.evaluateHandle(() => document.querySelector('button'));
// this is an ElementHandle, not a JSHandle
```
Therefore I've updated the original docs and added a large explanation to the
TSDoc for `page.evaluateHandle`.
In TypeScript land we'll assume the function will return a `JSHandle` but you
can tell TS otherwise via the generic argument, which can only be `JSHandle`
(the default) or `ElementHandle`:
```
const button = page.evaluateHandle<ElementHandle>(() => document.querySelector('button'));
```
The headful one I'm permanently skipping as I don't know what the issue is and I can't debug without getting my hands on a Windows machine. If anyone has one or is able to help, that'd be great!
The other I'm deferring another month and will ping the FF folks :)
This CL migrates all the tests to TypeScript. The main benefits of this is that we start consuming our TypeScript definitions and therefore find errors in them. The act of migrating found some bugs in our definitions and now we can be sure to avoid them going forwards.
You'll notice the addition of some `TODO`s in the code; I didn't want this CL to get any bigger than it already is but I intend to follow those up once this lands. It's mostly figuring out how to extend the `expect` types with our `toBeGolden` helpers and some other slight confusions with types that the tests exposed.
Co-authored-by: Mathias Bynens <mathias@qiwi.be>
As far as I can tell these became irrelevant as of v1.15 which added
`puppeteer.errors` and `puppeteer.devices [1]. This is a breaking change
but one that's easily mitigated. We've said that we don't consider
changes to our folder/file structure a breaking change, but we can't
really do that if we have these two top level files that we've
documented.
[1]: e3abb0aa32 (diff-522b24108d7446af4c59873472a90444)
These files will be used by both the web and node versions of Puppeteer.
Another name for this might be "core" but I don't want to cause
confusion with the puppeteer-core package that we publish at the moment.
Fix child process killing when the parent process SIGINTs.
If you `ctrl + c` the Puppeteer parent process, we would sometimes not properly handle killing of the child processes. This would then leave child processes behind, with running Chromium instances. This in turn could block Puppeteer from launching again and results in
cryptic errors.
Instead of using the generic `process.kill` with the process id (which for some reason is negative the pid, which I don't get), we can kill the child process directly by calling `proc.kill`.
Fixes#5729.
Fixes#4796.
Fixes#4963.
Fixes#4333.
Fixes#1825.
* chore: remove "Extracting..." log message
Fixes#5741.
* test: support extra Launcher options and skips
The extra Launcher options and skipping conditions enable
unit tests to be run more easily by third-parties, e.g.
browser vendors that are interested in Puppeteer support.
Extra Launcher options were previously removed as part of
switching away from the custom test harness.
* test: enable more tests for Firefox
We deferred this initially because our Windows CI built wasn't stable
and so debugging this was hard. It's now much more stable so let's push
this back a month but at the same time I'll reach out to the Moz folks
as it should be easier to debug reliably now CI is stable on Windows.
* Don't use expect within Promises (#5466)
If a call to expect fails within a Promise it will not
be resolved, and causing the test to crash.
The patch aligns the code similar to what is used by all
the other tests.
* chore: fix invalid SSL assertion on Catalina
The error Chrome gives with an invalid cert changes between older Mac
versions and Catalina as detailed here:
https://support.google.com/chrome/thread/18125056?hl=en.
This PR changes Travis to run Catalina (and we think most devs run up to
date OS versions) so this fix ensures the test behaviour is consistent
locally and on Travis.
For those on older Mac versions I've left a comment by the tests to
hopefully save them debugging!
Co-authored-by: Mathias Bynens <mathias@qiwi.be>
The coverage utils depend on `src/api.ts` being up to date and pointing to the right modules. If they aren't, you would get a cryptic error on CI:
```
1) "before all" hook in "{root}":
TypeError: Cannot read property 'prototype' of undefined
at traceAPICoverage (test/coverage-utils.js:40:54)
at Context.before (test/coverage-utils.js:103:7)
2) "after all" hook in "{root}":
TypeError: Cannot read property 'stop' of undefined
at Context.after (test/mocha-utils.js:168:22)
```
This change logs a clearer error that highlights the missing class and exits, so it's much easier to realise what's gone wrong.
Ideally the coverage wouldn't need a hardcoded list of sources, but until then this will help spot this error in the future.
This corresponds to Chromium 83.0.4103.0.
This roll includes:
- Enable SameSiteByDefaultCookies and CookiesWithoutSameSiteMustBeSecure https://crrev.com/c/2122809
When this test was failing, it would cause no future tests to run. This
was because the `expect` call within the `page.on` callback would throw
an error, and that would trigger a unhandled promise rejection that
caused the test framework to stop.
The fundamental issue here is making `expect` calls within callbacks.
They are brittle due to the fact that they throw, and the test framework
won't catch it, but also because you have no guarantee that they will
run. If the callback is never executed you dont' know about it.
Although it's slightly more code, using a stub is the way to do this.
Not only can we assert that the stub was called, we can make synchronous
`expect` calls that Mocha will pick up properly if they fail.
Before this change, running the tests (and making it fail on purpose)
would cause all test execution to stop:
```
> puppeteer@3.0.4-post unit /Users/jacktfranklin/src/puppeteer
> mocha --config mocha-config/puppeteer-unit-tests.js
.(node:69580) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: "yes."
Received: ""
at Page.<anonymous> (/Users/jacktfranklin/src/puppeteer/test/dialog.spec.js:42:37)
[snip]
(node:69580) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection ... [snip]
```
But with this change, the rest of the tests run:
```
> puppeteer@3.0.4-post unit /Users/jacktfranklin/src/puppeteer
> mocha --config mocha-config/puppeteer-unit-tests.js
Page.Events.Dialog
✓ should fire
1) should allow accepting prompts
✓ should dismiss the prompt
2 passing (2s)
1 failing
1) Page.Events.Dialog
should allow accepting prompts:
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: "yes."
Received: ""
at Context.<anonymous> (test/dialog.spec.js:53:35)
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:94:5)
```
This is much better because one failing test now doesn't stop the rest
of the test suite.
This probably isn't the only instance of this in the codebase so I
propose as we encounter them we fix them usng this commit as the
template.
* Warn when given unsupported product name.
Fixes#5844.
This change means when a user launches Puppeteer with a product name
that is not supported (which at the time of this commit means it's not
`firefox` or `chrome) we will warn them about it.
Decided on just a warning vs an error because the current behaviour is
that we fallback to launching Chrome and I don't think this warrants a
breaking change.
* chore: update how we track coverage during unit tests
The old method of tracking coverage was causing issues. If a test failed
on CI, that test's failure would be lost because the test failing would
in turn cause the coverage to fail, but the `process.exit(1)` in the
coverage code caused Mocha to not output anything useful.
Instead the coverage checker now:
* tracks the coverage in memory in a Map (this hasn't changed)
* after all tests, writes that to disk in test/coverage.json (which is
gitignored)
* we then run a single Mocha test that asserts every method was called.
This means if the test run fails, the build will fail and give the error
about that test run, and that output won't be lost when the coverage
then fails too.
Co-authored-by: Mathias Bynens <mathias@qiwi.be>
The codebase was incredibly inconsistent with the use of spacing around
curly braces, e.g.:
```
// this?
const a = {b: 1}
// or?
const a = { b: 1 }
```
This extended into import statements also. Google's styleguide is no
spacing, so we're going with that.
