**What kind of change does this PR introduce?**
I have browsers pool in some cloud. I want that only users with access
will be able to connect to them. So they must provide token through
headers. But puppeteer does not allow to send headers when connected to
browser by ws connection. So I added this feature.
Closes#7218
**What kind of change does this PR introduce?**
Spawn own server when running `ng e2e`. Give user option to not replace
`ng e2e`.
**Did you add tests for your changes?**
Yes.
**If relevant, did you update the documentation?**
Yes, `ng-schematics` README.md updated.
**Summary**
When running `ng-schematics`'s `ng e2e` command spawns it's own server.
This way we remove the need of developers to run `ng server` separately
thus increasing ease of use in development and CI.
We want to support Protractor migration so we give the user the option
to opt out of replacing `ng e2e` so they can have a gradual migration.
(Note: There may be issues with folder conflicts, to be address in a PR
for adding better Migration support)
**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?**
Yes, as we don't check if required options are there before spawning the
server.
**Other information**
Co-authored-by: Alex Rudenko <OrKoN@users.noreply.github.com>
**What kind of change does this PR introduce?**
Better type inference.
**Did you add tests for your changes?**
~Not yet.~ Yes.
**If relevant, did you update the documentation?**
Not yet.
**Summary**
<!-- Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing
problem does the pull request solve? -->
<!-- Try to link to an open issue for more information. -->
Currently methods that return an element handle, i.e. `.$`,
`.waitForSelector` attempt to infer the node element type from the
selector string. However, this only works when the selector is an exact
match of the element tag, i.e. a selector `"a"` would be inferred as
`HTMLAnchorElement` . And not when the selector is complex, i.e.
selectors `"a#some-id"`, `div > a`, `a:nth-child(2)` would all fallback
on `Element`.
This is due to simply looking up the the selector in
`HTMLElementTagNameMap` and `SVGElementTagNameMap` without any attempt
to parse the selector string.
This PR is an attempt to do so.
**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?**
<!-- If this PR introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and a migration path for existing applications. -->
This could break existing incorrect assertions using the `as` keyword.
**Other information**
~This PR introduces a dependency on the `type-fest` package.~
This PR is far from complete (no tests, no docs). Put out early for
feedback and discussion.
Co-authored-by: Alex Rudenko <OrKoN@users.noreply.github.com>
**What kind of change does this PR introduce?**
This replaces the default `ng e2e` with our custom builder. In the
feature it seem possible to remove the necessity of the user running the
server separately and run it from the builder - that will improve the
easy of use and CI of this schematic.
**Did you add tests for your changes?**
**If relevant, did you update the documentation?**
Yes - Updated `@puppeteer/ng-schematics` README.md
**Summary**
We want to not see the default `ng e2e` and we want to make it easier
for the user to run commands.
Angular Developer are likely to also use its' CLI.
**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?**
Yes. Users need to delete the default and initialize the schematics
again.
**Other information**
**What kind of change does this PR introduce?**
Adds `@puppeteer/ng-schematics` to the list of packages to be published
to `npm`
**Did you add tests for your changes?**
Not relevant.
**If relevant, did you update the documentation?**
Not for in this PR.
**Summary**
We want to publish to `npm` so people can do `ng add
@puppeteer/ng-schematics` and use it with Angular CLI.
**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?**
No
**Other information**
**What kind of change does this PR introduce?**
It lets Users create an schematic for Puppeteer in Angular project using
Node's new test runner.
**Did you add tests for your changes?**
Yes. Unit test for module.
**If relevant, did you update the documentation?**
No
**Summary**
**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?**
No
**Other information**
**What kind of change does this PR introduce?**
Adds Mocha as option for `ng-schematics`
**Did you add tests for your changes?**
Yes
**If relevant, did you update the documentation?**
No
**Summary**
User want a simple solution for the Testing library of their choose
**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?**
No
**Other information**
There are some improvements around the Babel that we can make so we
don't have duplicate code and files (In a Feature PR)
**What kind of change does this PR introduce?**
Adds Jest in `ng-schematics`. So you can scaffold test with Jest instead
of Jasmine
**Did you add tests for your changes?**
Yes
**If relevant, did you update the documentation?**
No
**Summary**
Users can more easily integrate test with Puppeteer and their library of
choose.
**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?**
No
**Other information**
**What kind of change does this PR introduce?**
It introduces schematic for Angular that integrate with its CLI.
First revision support Jasmine.
**Did you add tests for your changes?**
Added Unit tests for each scenario.
**Summary**
The idea is to provide a an example for setting up Puppeteer and Angular
for testing user flows.
**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?**
No
**Other information**
For Feature PRs:
- Introduce CL for tests
- Hook up NPM package publishing
- Update README.md
#8768 fixes flakiness in handling navigations but it didn't account for
the fact that subsequent navigation requests could be aborted via the
request interception. In that case, the navigationResponseReceived
promise would never be resolved. This PR adds a listener for the failed
network requests and resolves the promise if the network request has
failed. Adding test coverage for this seems tricky, as the reproduction
depends on timing of the second navigation request.
Closes#9175
This PR updates the docs regarding configuring puppeteer. In addition,
some changes have been made to the documentation generator to show
default values on the documentation site.
Also fixes: https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/pull/9144
This PR adds configurations files to `puppeteer`'s methods for
configuration. Under the hood, `puppeteer` relies on
https://www.npmjs.com/package/cosmiconfig which resolves several formats
of configuration:
- a `puppeteer` property in package.json
- a `.puppeteerrc` file in JSON or YAML format
- a `.puppeteerrc.json`, `.puppeteerrc.yaml`, `.puppeteerrc.yml`,
`.puppeteerrc.js`, or `.puppeteerrc.cjs` file
- a `puppeteer.config.js` or `puppeteer.config.cjs` CommonJS module
exporting an object
Documentation will be added later.
Fixed: #9128
This PR makes some improvements to the documentation. It migrates
docker, debugging, and chrome extension documentation to the `guides`
folder and also updates some of the terminology.
This PR removes the deprecated query selector API from the `puppeteer`
instance. Direct imports of the query selector API have also been
deprecated and users are now expected to use the static methods defined
on `Puppeteer`.
This PR removes the deprecated `puppeteer.devices` in favor of a new
exported object `KnownDevices`. `devices` can also be exported, but has
been deprecated.
This PR combines the publishing workflows for npm packages and Docker.
It also fixes an issue where multiple tags would trigger publishing all
packages.
This PR moves the puppeteer source code into separate mono-repo packages:
- `puppeteer` and `puppeteer-core` are now separated into their own
packages.
- `puppeteer-core` has a new exports called `puppeteer-core/internal`
for internal usage.
Tests and various tools have been updated to accommodate the migration.
This PR starts the monorepo migrations as per
https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/issues/8922. To scope migrations,
we are only moving the `testserver` into a separate package. Further
migrations will come later.
