Two main sources of flakiness addressed:
1) we should dispose the lifecycle watcher after we waited for the navigation response (bad API? we need to refactor but I think it'd be valuable to stabilize tests first without too many changes).
2) we should wait for the navigation request's response if there is a navigation request in the watcher.
Closes#8644
This PR works around the upstream bug crbug.com/1325782. Previously Puppeteer relied on the presence of the loaderId to determine the kind of navigation and expected events. It does not look like there is a reason to do so: instead, we could see what events we get and proceed accordingly.
* chore: enforce file extensions on imports
To make our output agnostic it should include file extensions in the
output, as per the ESM spec. It's a bit odd for Node packages but makes
it easier to publish a browser build.
This file is now deprecated and only used by the coverage tool and
DocLint - these tools will be updated to not rely on it in the future.
We now have events defined per class - e.g. all the events that `Page`
can emit are defined in the `PageEmittedEvents` enum, and similar. We
have to keep `Events.ts` around for the aforementioned tools, but don't
want its usage creeping back into our source code.
This is part of the effort to remove `Events.ts` in favour of defining
events next to the class that emits them. In this case these events are
internal, so there's no docs changes, but it's still worth doing such
that we can remove the Events.ts file in the long term once all the
different events are migrated.
I noticed that DOMWorld was spitting a lot of warnings out when we
generated the docs. It was mostly easy tidy-ups and removing old JSDoc
comments and now the warnings are gone :)
These files will be used by both the web and node versions of Puppeteer.
Another name for this might be "core" but I don't want to cause
confusion with the puppeteer-core package that we publish at the moment.
