This change started as a small change to pull types from DefinitelyTyped over to
Puppeteer for the `evaluateHandle` function but instead ended up also fixing
what looks to be a long standing issue with our existing documentation.
`evaluateHandle` can in fact return an `ElementHandle` rather than a `JSHandle`.
Note that `ElementHandle` extends `JSHandle` so whilst the docs are technically
correct (all ElementHandles are JSHandles) it's confusing because JSHandles
don't have methods like `click` on them, but ElementHandles do.
if you return something that is an HTML element:
```
const button = page.evaluateHandle(() => document.querySelector('button'));
// this is an ElementHandle, not a JSHandle
```
Therefore I've updated the original docs and added a large explanation to the
TSDoc for `page.evaluateHandle`.
In TypeScript land we'll assume the function will return a `JSHandle` but you
can tell TS otherwise via the generic argument, which can only be `JSHandle`
(the default) or `ElementHandle`:
```
const button = page.evaluateHandle<ElementHandle>(() => document.querySelector('button'));
```
The headful one I'm permanently skipping as I don't know what the issue is and I can't debug without getting my hands on a Windows machine. If anyone has one or is able to help, that'd be great!
The other I'm deferring another month and will ping the FF folks :)
I think when the FF version changes this check breaks - let's just make
it check that a version installed rather than the specific version else
this will happen on a continuing basis.
* chore: Don't store revisions in `package.json`
It's quite messy to have to require the `package.json` file in multiple
places purely to find out what revision of a given browser we want to
use. We can also achieve better type safety by placing it in an actual
source file.
This commit makes that change and also tidies up our reliance on
`package.json` within the source code generally; we now only use it to
find the location of the Puppeteer root such that we know where to
install downloaded browsers to.
To avoid using `package.json` to parse the name of the module, we also
now explicitly have an entry point for the Puppeteer module and the
Puppeter Core module. This will make it easier in the future to ship
less code as part of core (e.g. core never needs to download a browser,
so why ship that code?). Core can also then not have any revisions based
info contained in it.
The test install script has also been updated to ensure that
puppeteer-core can be installed correctly too.
Finally, the `install` script has been moved to TypeScript for nicer
typechecking and safety. The functionality of it has not changed.
* chore(agnostic): ship CJS and ESM builds
For our work to enable Puppeteer in other environments (e.g. a browser)
we need to ship an ESM build. This commit changes our config to ship to
`lib/cjs` and `lib/esm` accordingly. The majority of our code stays the
same, with one small fix for the CJS build to ensure that we ship a
version that lets you `require('puppeteer')` rather than have to
`require('puppeteer').default`. We do this with the `cjs-entry.js` which
is what the `main` field in our `package.json` points to.
We also swap to `read-pkg-up` to find the `package.json` file. This is
because the folder structure of `lib/` does not match `src/` now we ship
to `cjs` and `esm`, so you cannot rely on exact paths. This module works
up from the file to find the nearest `package.json` so it will always
find Puppeteer's `package.json`.
Note that we *do not* point any users to the ESM build. We happen to
ship those files so people who know about them can get at them but it's
not expected (nor will we actively support) that people will rely on
them. The CommonJS build is considered our main build.
We may make breaking changes to the structure of the ESM build which we
will do without requiring new major versions. For example the ESM build
currently ships all files that the CJS build does, but given we are
working on the ESM build being able to run in the browser this may
change over time.
Long term once the Node versions catch up we can ditch CJS and ship
exclusively ESM but we are not there yet.
* feat(types): improve typing of `.evaluate()`
This is the start of the work to take the types from the
`@types/puppeteer` repository and port them into our repo so we can ship
our built-in types out the box.
This change types the `evaluate` function properly. It takes a generic
type which is the type of the function you're passing, and the arguments
and the return that you get back from the `evaluate` call are typed
correctly.
DOMWorld only needs to use Node's `fs` module if you're adding a
filepath as a script/style tag. We can detect this case and run the
`require` inline such that in a browser this code won't execute.
* Adds tsdoc to Mouse class
* Updates puppeteer class tsdoc
* docs(new): add TSDoc comments to BrowserFetcher (#6078)
* Adds tsdoc for Touchscreen (#6087)
Co-authored-by: martinsplitt <martin@geekonaut.de>
* Adds tsdoc to Mouse class
* Fixes tsdoc comment for Mouse class
Co-authored-by: martinsplitt <martin@geekonaut.de>
This CL migrates all the tests to TypeScript. The main benefits of this is that we start consuming our TypeScript definitions and therefore find errors in them. The act of migrating found some bugs in our definitions and now we can be sure to avoid them going forwards.
You'll notice the addition of some `TODO`s in the code; I didn't want this CL to get any bigger than it already is but I intend to follow those up once this lands. It's mostly figuring out how to extend the `expect` types with our `toBeGolden` helpers and some other slight confusions with types that the tests exposed.
Co-authored-by: Mathias Bynens <mathias@qiwi.be>
Without the API-* dependencies pinned different versions may be
installed on local machines vs CI. One of the checks we do is to check
that the checked in docs matches what is generated on CI. Therefore we
need to ensure devs locally run the exact version that CI runs such that
they generate the same output. So in this case we pin to a particular
version of the dependencies.
As far as I can tell these became irrelevant as of v1.15 which added
`puppeteer.errors` and `puppeteer.devices [1]. This is a breaking change
but one that's easily mitigated. We've said that we don't consider
changes to our folder/file structure a breaking change, but we can't
really do that if we have these two top level files that we've
documented.
[1]: e3abb0aa32 (diff-522b24108d7446af4c59873472a90444)
It was causing some infra issues when trying to migrate tests to
TypeScript (that's WIP in another branch that I'll have up soon). It's
unusual to have the entire src in TS except for the main file, which
then reaches into the compiled `lib` directory for the files it needs.
Much better is to move the entry point into TypeScript itself and update
the `main` entry in our `package.json` to point to the compiled output.
This also has the advantange of hooking up all the TS type defs that we
are shipping and will make that process easier too, along with making it
easier to port our tests to TypeScript.
`api.ts` is a list of all our modules which is used to install a helper
and by DocLint. It's not that useful for our dep graph because it
literally requires the majority of modules so it just clutters up the diagram.
These files will be used by both the web and node versions of Puppeteer.
Another name for this might be "core" but I don't want to cause
confusion with the puppeteer-core package that we publish at the moment.
`--max-depth` stopped the chart including our own modules. What we want
instead is the `do-not-follow` option to make it go to infinite depth in
our code but stop at the top level of a node module.
This is another step towards making Puppeteer agnostic of environment
and being able to run in Node or a browser.
The files in the `node` directory are ones that would only be needed in
the Node build - e.g. the code that downloads and launches a local
browser instance.
The long term vision here is to have three folders:
* node - Node only code
* web - Web only code
* common - code that is shared
But rather than do that in one PR I'm going to split it up to make it
easier to review and deal with.
