This corresponds to Chromium 85.0.4182.0.
This roll includes:
- Enable SameSiteByDefaultCookies and CookiesWithoutSameSiteMustBeSecure
https://crrev.com/c/2231445
- [FlexNG] Enable FlexNG by default
https://crrev.com/c/2216595Closes#6151.
The Node debug library uses the `DEBUG` environment variable to
configure what gets logged. Our browser version just logs everything;
this commit changes it to look for `window.__PUPPETEER_DEBUG` and matches the behaviour accordingly:
* If the value is not set, nothing is logged.
* If the value is set to `*` everything is logged.
* If the value is set to a string `foo`, messages with that prefix are
logged.
* If the value is set to a string ending in `*`, e.g. `foo*`, messages
with prefixes that start with `foo` are logged.
Also took the opportunity to pull out the PDF types into their own file
to clear up `Page.ts` slightly and give the PDF code a more natural
place to live.
* chore: vendor Mitt into src/common/third-party
As discussed in #6203 we need to vendor our common dependencies in so
that when we ship an ESM build all imports point to file paths and do
not rely on Node resolution (e.g. a browser does not understand `import
mitt from 'mitt'`).
* chore: enforce file extensions on imports
To make our output agnostic it should include file extensions in the
output, as per the ESM spec. It's a bit odd for Node packages but makes
it easier to publish a browser build.
* feat(chromium): roll Chromium to r768783
* fix: update unit test for crrev:2135046
* chore: update devtools-protocol revision
Co-authored-by: Changhao Han <changhaohan@chromium.org>
* chore: Use devtools-protocol package
Rather than maintain our own protocol we can instead use the devtools-protocol package and pin it to the version of Chromium that Puppeteer is shipping with.
The only changes are naming changes between the bespoke protocol that Puppeteer created and the devtools-protocol one.
Now the async hooks helper is gone api.ts was only used by the coverage
tools and by doclint.
DocLint is nearing the end of its lifespan with the TSDoc work, so I
focused on how best to define a list of modules for the coverage
tooling. They define an object of classes, and the path to that module.
They need the full path because we also check if the module exports any
events that need to be emitted - the coverage tool asserts that the
emitting of those events is also tested.
It's not _great_ that DocLint relies on a constant defined in the
coverage utils, but it should only be this way for a short period of
time and no one is actively working on DocLint (bar the effort to remove
it) so I don't think this is worth worrying about.
This change also broke the DocLint tests; based on the fact that DocLint is on its way out it doesn't feel worth fixing the tests, so this commit also removes them.
* chore: remove `installAsyncStackHooks` helper
This code was written when browsers/Node didn't support errors in async
functions very well. They now do a much better job of this, so we can
lose the additonal complexity from our codebase and leave it to the host
environment :)
* lazy launcher is private
* remove async stack test
This file is now deprecated and only used by the coverage tool and
DocLint - these tools will be updated to not rely on it in the future.
We now have events defined per class - e.g. all the events that `Page`
can emit are defined in the `PageEmittedEvents` enum, and similar. We
have to keep `Events.ts` around for the aforementioned tools, but don't
want its usage creeping back into our source code.
On a getter function you don't use `@returns` (as that's just for
methods). Instead we can just add to the general remarks to explain what
the property is providing.
This is part of the effort to remove `Events.ts` in favour of defining
events next to the class that emits them. In this case these events are
internal, so there's no docs changes, but it's still worth doing such
that we can remove the Events.ts file in the long term once all the
different events are migrated.
I noticed that DOMWorld was spitting a lot of warnings out when we
generated the docs. It was mostly easy tidy-ups and removing old JSDoc
comments and now the warnings are gone :)
* chore(docs): migrate & document all Page events
Rather than a generic `Events.ts` file we can instead document events as
an enum within each individual class. It's easier to document and work
with, and it's clearer where events originate from.
Previously Node.js was detected by the lack of `global.document` which doesn’t work in case JSDOM is being used in Node.js. Instead, we now detect `process.versions.node`, like here: 426943ae93 (diff-168726dbe96b3ce427e7fedce31bb0bc).
Fixes#6147.
* chore(docs): reduce warnings when generating docs
This is a bunch of small miscellaneous fixes that reduce the amount of
warnings logged when generating our new docs. The long term goal is to
get this list down to 0 warnings, but I'll do it in multiple PRs.
* satisfy doclint
If you want to run TypeScript only to verify that it's typechecking correctly, this command is quicker as it doesn't output CJS and ESM to disk. Useful for checking during development.
This pulls in the types (based on the DefinitelyTyped repo) for
`page.$eval` (and the `$eval` method on other classes). The `$eval`
method is quite hard to type due to the way we wrap and unwrap
ElementHandles that are passed to / returned from the `pageFunction`
that users provide.
Longer term we can improve the types by providing type overloads as
DefinitelyTyped does but I've deferred that for now (see the `TODO` in
the code for more details).
This change started as a small change to pull types from DefinitelyTyped over to
Puppeteer for the `evaluateHandle` function but instead ended up also fixing
what looks to be a long standing issue with our existing documentation.
`evaluateHandle` can in fact return an `ElementHandle` rather than a `JSHandle`.
Note that `ElementHandle` extends `JSHandle` so whilst the docs are technically
correct (all ElementHandles are JSHandles) it's confusing because JSHandles
don't have methods like `click` on them, but ElementHandles do.
if you return something that is an HTML element:
```
const button = page.evaluateHandle(() => document.querySelector('button'));
// this is an ElementHandle, not a JSHandle
```
Therefore I've updated the original docs and added a large explanation to the
TSDoc for `page.evaluateHandle`.
In TypeScript land we'll assume the function will return a `JSHandle` but you
can tell TS otherwise via the generic argument, which can only be `JSHandle`
(the default) or `ElementHandle`:
```
const button = page.evaluateHandle<ElementHandle>(() => document.querySelector('button'));
```
The headful one I'm permanently skipping as I don't know what the issue is and I can't debug without getting my hands on a Windows machine. If anyone has one or is able to help, that'd be great!
The other I'm deferring another month and will ping the FF folks :)
